|
|
Post by bremner on Mar 29, 2011 10:52:04 GMT
There are roughly 80 members who have created an account and have not posted anything, which makes them Zero Posters.
|
|
|
|
Post by harty on Mar 29, 2011 10:56:11 GMT
IMO delete them. What time frame do you give them to post?? 1 month??
|
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 11:05:00 GMT
IMO they should contribute something. Like Harty I feel it's important to identify a specific time frame/limit an account can remain inactive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donko on Mar 29, 2011 11:21:20 GMT
I think we should go round to their houses, look through their windows and watch what they are doing, see how they like it. (this of course doesn't apply to Fish, what with the abundance of restraining orders already out against him, you sit this one out mate)
|
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 11:44:02 GMT
I think we should go round to their houses, look through their windows and watch what they are doing, see how they like it. (this of course doesn't apply to Fish, what with the abundance of restraining orders already out against him, you sit this one out mate) Hahaha!! Probably for the best!!! ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by pele on Mar 29, 2011 12:14:42 GMT
IMO delete them. What time frame do you give them to post?? 1 month?? Agree with this. |
|
|
|
Post by pele on Mar 29, 2011 12:15:23 GMT
IMO they should contribute something. Like Harty I feel it's important to identify a specific time frame/limit an account can remain inactive. Mr Fish you just settle and let the big boys sort this out ;D |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 12:30:55 GMT
Totally disagree here ! There are people who are disgusted at levels of personal abuse n bias on here in the past season or 2 ,and feel they can't post at times.
Let it be the way it is lads
|
|
|
|
Post by Donko on Mar 29, 2011 12:37:02 GMT
Totally disagree here ! There are people who are disgusted at levels of personal abuse n bias on here in the past season or 2 ,and feel they can't post at times. Let it be the way it is lads Put it like this, if you owned a lapdance bar, would you let some fella stare in the window all day without contributing to your profits |
|
|
|
Post by bap on Mar 29, 2011 12:43:13 GMT
Totally disagree here ! There are people who are disgusted at levels of personal abuse n bias on here in the past season or 2 ,and feel they can't post at times. Let it be the way it is lads Put it like this, if you owned a lapdance bar, would you let some fella stare in the window all day without contributing to your profits I wouldnt notice anybody looking in the window. I'd be too busy with staff welfare problems. |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 12:45:51 GMT
If this was a lapdance bar Wee Jnr88 would never be outo here  Your comparisons don't equate Donks - try again mate |
|
|
|
Post by Dinger on Mar 29, 2011 12:50:24 GMT
ban them  we've not had someone banned in ages aye delete them, half prob dont even look? then again they might just check results.... mass mail everyone saying that it's going to happen to non posterd at the start of the month to give them time?? |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 12:51:39 GMT
Them glasses will be getting steamed up Bap  Bit like myself I may add |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 12:54:40 GMT
You up at the game allready Dinger  Goinna have to give up my ticket mate as fceking car broke down on me and won't be back in time  |
|
|
|
Post by turfcutter on Mar 29, 2011 13:14:21 GMT
IMO delete them. What time frame do you give them to post?? 1 month?? im 100% behind this suggestion. ban them to feck after a month of noseiness but whats to stop them creating a new one straight away...it has been done in the past..and quite recently too  |
|
|
|
Post by bremner on Mar 29, 2011 13:23:37 GMT
IMO delete them. What time frame do you give them to post?? 1 month?? I'm 100% behind this suggestion. ban them to feck after a month of noseiness but whats to stop them creating a new one straight away...it has been done in the past..and quite recently too I look at it on a regular basis turfcutter, so have been deleting them over the last few months. I just wanted to know what fellow members thought. For me this is an interactive forum for discussions. To log on, not get involved and then log off again and not post is not a member who contributes to this forum therefore they should be deleted and should keep getting deleted if they sign up again and dont post. However, I think they should post within a week or they get extermanated.... ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 13:24:59 GMT
IMO they should contribute something. Like Harty I feel it's important to identify a specific time frame/limit an account can remain inactive. Mr Fish you just settle and let the big boys sort this out ;D Can't say that didn't hurt Pele!!  ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 13:27:50 GMT
Is this not the same as having the log in option activated in the first place, to deter the letches?? For me it's the same idea. Give them a time scale to contribute or get them tae blazes!! None of my business I know but just thought the big boys would like some input from us lesser mortals!! (fack aff Pele) ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 13:29:40 GMT
Dry your eyes Fish |
|
|
|
Post by harty on Mar 29, 2011 13:29:56 GMT
I'm 100% behind this suggestion. ban them to feck after a month of noseiness but whats to stop them creating a new one straight away...it has been done in the past..and quite recently too I look at it on a regular basis turfcutter, so have been deleting them over the last few months. I just wanted to know what fellow members thought. For me this is an interactive forum for discussions. To log on, not get involved and then log off again and not post is not a member who contributes to this forum therefore they should be deleted and should keep getting deleted if they sign up again and dont post. However, I think they should post within a week or they get extermanated.... ;D ;D So when you disappear up your own arse for a month, Me and Pele takeover. Mayhem. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 13:32:24 GMT
So what's the real reason behind this Bumner Who you looking rid of?  |
|
|
|
Post by bap on Mar 29, 2011 13:39:58 GMT
It can be quite scary sticking a first post on with the fear that the powermongers with 1000's of posts are going to slap you down straightaway. And some of the accounts must be duplicates. Just looking at the birthdays today I wonder if seany knows seanyirish? ?? |
|
|
|
Post by Donko on Mar 29, 2011 13:48:31 GMT
Seanyirish had to set up a new account as he couldn't get logged on as Seanyirish anymore, hence the new account called Seany
|
|
|
|
Post by bazza85 on Mar 29, 2011 13:50:09 GMT
i don't think they should be deleted, some people just don't feel the need to comment on every thread going, it is handy for people to just log on and c results, fixtures etc etc
|
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 15:29:35 GMT
Dry your eyes Fish Sorry George but the stats don't lie, the "NO" men are winning!! ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 18:30:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mrfish on Mar 29, 2011 19:06:35 GMT
Sorry George.... ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Mar 29, 2011 19:10:16 GMT
i don't think they should be deleted, some people just don't feel the need to comment on every thread going, it is handy for people to just log on and c results, fixtures etc etc Completely agree with bazza85. As i now live in Belfast, can't access the site while in work and don't play in BSML anymore I enjoy logging in and checking how the leagues are going etc each week. |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 19:15:30 GMT
Lmao @ Fishster Class mate! Not fair them fcekin pics you hure ye Show me how Obe Wan Can Obe |
|
|
|
Post by QUIGS on Mar 29, 2011 19:19:06 GMT
Dry your eyes Fish Sorry George but the stats don't lie, the "NO" men are winning!! ;D ;D Excuse me Trout-Beke the Yes men are rallying a tad !! |
|
