rumour

[DavyFTB]

Nothing like a good auld rumour thread eh.

Shore lose 12 points? What for???

Likely to be relegated now and rumours of folding???

[pele]

I think anyone caught doing this should be hammered just like shore have been.

Makes a mockery of the league.

[DavyFTB]

What were they caught doing pele?

[pele]

Oct 27, 2012 18:13:28 GMT DavyFTB said:

What were they caught doing pele?

I believe they played an illegible player against ahoghill thistle but not 100% on that, big Goram could fill you in better ;D

[DavyFTB]

Cheating...and might possibly get relegated!!!!!! Ooh the irony!!!

[mrfish]

Has this actually happened or is there to be a decision/meeting??

[DavyFTB]

I think it has def happened but im sure there is someone from shore or thistle who can confirm this.

[pele]

Confirmed today in the paper shore lost 12 points

[quasimodo]

Just being nosey but seen this in paper today to.If they played an ineligable player and get 12points took of.Looking at the lge below says Templepatrick did the same and only got 1point.What did Shore do and what did Templepatrick do? must be a massive difference???

[jnr88]

Oct 30, 2012 21:21:03 GMT quasimodo said:

Just being nosey but seen this in paper today to.If they played an ineligable player and get 12points took of.Looking at the lge below says Templepatrick did the same and only got 1point.What did Shore do and what did Templepatrick do? must be a massive difference???

shore wer found guilty of knowingly playing an ineligable player which brings a punishment of a 12 point deduction!! templepatrick wernt so wer just deducted the points for the game they played the wrong player!!

[Jeff]

That makes no sense at all jnr. If templepatrick were deducted 1 point they must have knowingly played an in eligible player and got caught hence the 1 point deduction. I couldn't care less tbh just seems strange

[Bale]

I think he means they weren't found guilty of 'knowingly' playing an eligible player where shore were found guilty. That's my understanding

[Donko]

Templepatrick could have played the fella, thinking he was signed, only to find out later he wasn't, therefore not "knowingly" playing an ineligible player.

[Jeff]

Ah right makes more sense

[quasimodo]

that's all i wanted to know :-)

[ratman]

antrim boys at it again....

[pele]

Nov 1, 2012 9:52:00 GMT ratman said:

antrim boys at it again....

Monte taking no s**te this time ratman, really has made a statement, I think after all these years he's singing from the same hymn sheet as you ;D

[ratman]

fair play to him pele, im not the sort of boy to say i told you so but this sort of thing has been brewing for a while and its good to see some firm action....remember what i said about the racism is coming true in england as well...

[pele10]

How do you *prove* that a team "knowingly" played an inelligible player?

Could Shore not just say "ah we thought he was signed" or "we didnt know he was inelligible"??

Im genuinely not taking the piss, Im curious as to how this is proven!

[pele]

Nov 1, 2012 11:11:36 GMT pele10 said:

How do you *prove* that a team "knowingly" played an inelligible player?

Could Shore not just say "ah we thought he was signed" or "we didnt know he was inelligible"??

Im genuinely not taking the piss, Im curious as to how this is proven!

Just a guess but maybe temple put the players name on the card and shore didn't!

[Dowie-RAFC]

Some guess that pele ;-)

[pele10]

Nov 1, 2012 11:45:40 GMT Dowie-RAFC said:

Some guess that pele ;-)

;D

OK, but could you still not play the "we didnt know" card??

[Donko]

If you play Michael Maybin under Chris Dowies name then that is knowingly playing an ineligible player. If you put Michael Maybin on the card, but his registration hasn't gone through in time, then you didn't know he was ineligible.... think that's the difference

[pele]

Nov 1, 2012 11:48:31 GMT pele10 said:

Nov 1, 2012 11:45:40 GMT Dowie-RAFC said:

Some guess that pele ;-)

;D

OK, but could you still not play the "we didnt know" card??

How? Surely the first question would be "why hadn't you his correct name down?" ;D

Come on wee burny, your supposed to be smart one of the sideburn brothers

[pele]

Nov 1, 2012 11:52:31 GMT Donko said:

If you play Michael Maybin under Chris Dowies name then that is knowingly playing an ineligible player. If you put Michael Maybin on the card, but his registration hasn't gone through in time, then you didn't know he was ineligible.... think that's the difference

Some boys eh donko ;D and this s the boy who gives me it advice, lap pie be blowing up any day soon ;D

[pele]

Nov 1, 2012 11:45:40 GMT Dowie-RAFC said:

Some guess that pele ;-)

Sssshhhh you heard that at the meeting, you know the one where no carniny representation was present

[ratman]

sounds to me like templepatrick got off a bit lightly....

[Dowie-RAFC]

Nov 1, 2012 11:59:18 GMT @pele said:

Nov 1, 2012 11:45:40 GMT Dowie-RAFC said:

Some guess that pele ;-)

Sssshhhh you heard that at the meeting, you know the one where no carniny representation was present

Same meeting where the o Kane cup draw was supposed to be made but was done at home beforehand ?

[Jeff]

Someone remind me again why this draw wasn't done at the meeting

[pele10]

Nov 1, 2012 11:52:31 GMT Donko said:

If you play Michael Maybin under Chris Dowies name then that is knowingly playing an ineligible player. If you put Michael Maybin on the card, but his registration hasn't gone through in time, then you didn't know he was ineligible.... think that's the difference

Cheers Donko - cleared that one up for me...was getting myself confused!!